 Sign up now to gain access to all the features of this website. NEW — access is now open to ALL USERS! — Already registered? Please log in.

# Work Zone Capacity

 Kevin Murai State of California Department of Transportation Work Zone Capacity was posted on January 9th, 2019 at 5:04 PM EST regarding Chapter 10: Freeway Facilities Core Methodology Equation 10-9 Work zone capacity As noted, the average queue discharge drop rate is higher in a freeway work zone than in a non-work zone. By using these rates in equation 10-9, the calculated work zone capacity will always be greater than the non-work zone capacity, which should not be the case. Should the denominator in equation 10-9 be adding rather than subtracting the average queue discharge drop rate? For example QDRwz=2000 Cwz (13.4% avg queue discharge drop) = 2309 Cnon-wz (7% avg queue discharge drop) = 2151 If you revise equation 10-9 by adding the avg queue discharge drop rather than subtracting, then Cwz = 1764 Cnon-wz = 1869 These rates make more sense. Any clarification would be appreciated. Thank you. (Edited July 9th, 2020 at 1:31 PM EDT) Cooper Calhoun Alabama Department of Transportation RE: Work Zone Capacity was posted on January 24th, 2020 at 3:12 PM EST I am noticing the same situation with the equation for work zone free-flow speed. As stated on pg.10-44 the higher the work zone speed limit then the higher the work zone FFS, but the equation calculates differently. (Edited July 24th, 2020 at 1:32 PM EDT)